Friday, September 19, 2008

The Chubb Chubbs



Communication of any sort is based largely on our perception, which is the process by which we make sense of the world around us. We attach a personal meaning to the communication we receive, through an integrated process of selection, organization and interpretation. Thus, individuals decipher messages differently. How then, does an animation ensure that it's targeted audience interprets the intended message correctly? Let's do an autopsy on the above animation, to uncover the seamless workings of communication behind the pixels.

It doesn't take a three year old to tell that the underlying message of the animation is perception- do not judge a book by it's cover. It makes use of the society's common perception of the harmful and the helpless, and swap the personal prototypes around for a twist near the end of the clip. Harm, in this animation, is personified as weapon-wielding, armour-cladding, gargantuan aliens with a looming thunderstorm wherever they go. Helplessness, on the other hand, is characterized by a handful of small yellow balls of fluff, bearing uncanny resemblances with our Earth-bound chicks. These characteristic choices are meticulously created based on the degree of shared perception (convergence) that Man established through communication. Somehow, Man has came to a general consensus that angry creatures with bulging muscles and thunderstorms are threatening; while chicks are, other than being too adorable, basically helpless.

The video utilizes the various stimuli to draw our attention. The element of novelty is apparent in the setting of the video- a bar on an alien planet. Familiar movie characters, such as "Star Wars" and "Aliens", are also deployed all over the scene doing things that we do not catch them doing on screen. If these are not enough, they have included a female alien vocalist, who looks like a hippopotamus, with three boobs! (Again, that may be a male alien. But we Earthlings have already developed a personal prototype that characters with boobs are females- based on our very own Earthling experiences.) The "frequent" stimulus is seen when the main character (the loser alien) repeatedly gets kicked out of the bar for interrupting the song due to his clumsiness. This repetitive slapstick humor drives us to try to predict when is the next time he is going to do something stupid again. Furthermore, a critical message is delivered by a Jar Jar Bings look-alike alien. The "intensity" stimulus here, plays with the fame of the creature to allow us to devote our attention to what it says.

Finally, the twist develops slowly as follows. Someone finally manages to warn the bar that the "Chubb Chubbs are coming!" The entire bar flushes out of the bar, leaving the main character and the handful of innocent looking chicks at the mercy of the wrath of the "Chubb Chubbs". As the main character places the chicks into his bucket in an attempt to save them, the "Chubb Chubbs" with the thunderous storm cloud close in. At this point, audience will probably wonder why in the world will people name such monstrosity a "Chubb Chubb"? Well, they are in for a twist. When the innocent looking "chicks" found themselves exposed to the threatening horde that stood in front of them, they went berserk, revealing their rows of razor sharp teeth and pounced on the giants, tearing them up literally within seconds. Now, does the name "Chubb Chubbs" make sense when we realize that they really are chubby little angry fur balls?

So, the next time you see a chick, think twice, before you pick it up and play with it. For guys, yes, the pun applies. ;)

7 comments:

Zed Ngoh said...

i have friends worthy of the sumo wrestling ring. they have man-boobs. but you don't see me perceiving them as women? =P

that was quite a good clip you found to show the pitfalls of perception. it is such a simple mistake to make, but most of us still practise it. living in a salad bowl of different races, we must learn to change the perceptional stereotypes which we carry of our coconut scented or rendang loving friends!

fen said...

Yupp, you are right. I guess we are always "blinded" by our perception. I guess that is something that cannot be changed so easily.

In most cases, we stick to our own thinking despite knowing the truth. Maybe that's a form of denial as well?

On the other hand, having these common perceptions do help us to understand each other better. There are some things that we do not have to say it out very clearly for people to understand as well right? Isn't that a good thing as well?

com101, group 9 said...

good read.
this cleary reinforces the point that we all need to be more open minded when we look at things, rather than be blinded by our own perceptions.
ps the chubs chubbs are damn cute

herbabykicks said...

three boobs? man,i didnt even notice.goes to show what you see and i dont! perception differences eh.i guess interpretation is very subjective and i think you've made your point in saying that we shouldnt judge a book by its cover.

its a good clip though and i like your anaylsis.prototypes,stimulli all. and i agree with your friend zed that it shows the pitfalls of perception, but without perception, what would we make of the world? it is part of what makes us unique.

wished there was a continuation of how he could get back at the people in the pub with the chubb chubbs!

diet whipped cream said...

yeah.. watch beyond the credits.. he "forced" them into applauding his singing.. hah

Chloe said...

Yes we do agree that most of us have our perceptual set in a way that muscular monster are angry and evil while white chicks are vulnerable and cute.
I guess in our cognitive process, we group them based on what we feel best represent angry monsters and pretty chicks. This grouping is called prototypes.
Many a times in our daily lives, we judge a person by he or she based on the first impression and in this case would be appearance. You see a nerdy looking guy and group him under the bookworm club but in fact he might the star player in the tennis club.
Hence, overdependent on prototypes would cause perceptual errors which an effective communicator should not make.

diet whipped cream said...

yeah.. i totally agree.
in fact, i once read an article stating that these prototypes happen ever so often in the workplace, especially during interviews.

laziness is represented by a fat person, even if the person is willing to slog his life away for the company.

incompetence is associated with a short person, even if he or she may be quick to come up with million dollar deals.

excessive use of prototypes can not only cause an organization to lose a valuable addition to the team, but also an individual's failure to perform to his or her potential.

remember, we're all made to do great. and this greatness is NOT bounded by our physical attributes.

one excellent example:
Spud Webb, standing at a mere 1.65m, went on to win an NBA Slam Dunk competition title against his team mate Dominique Wilkins who towers over Webb at 2.07m. He became the first in NBS history, under 6 feet tall, to win a Slam Dunk competition.
So, not all good basketball players are tall.